How 4D imaging radar enhances autonomous driving with real-time, accurate environmental insights

Four-dimensional (4D) imaging radar is a key technology for autonomous driving, providing real-time and accurate information about the surrounding environment. To learn more, we spoke to executives from Aptiv.

Four-dimensional imaging radar is an emerging key technology for autonomous driving, providing real time and accurate insights into the surrounding environment. It complements other sensors such as cameras and is used in conjunction with these in the automotive industry. The 4D imaging radar uses multiple antenna arrays to gather extensive data and generate precise 3D models. It operates at frequencies such as 77 or 79 GHz, enabling split-second reaction times that are required for autonomous vehicles. The future of imaging radar involves improving sensor fusion algorithms and developing wider aperture radar systems to achieve higher levels of autonomy in autonomous vehicles.

The following is an edited transcript of the conversation.

S&P Global Mobility: Can you describe the significance of 4D or imaging radar in the evolution of radar technology? In what ways does imaging radar improve automated driving or enable higher levels of automation, such as in navigating tricky situations, managing false-positives, or filling a performance gap in other common sensors like camera, traditional radar or lidar? 

Aptiv executives: 4D radar has significant advantages over 3D radar, particularly when it comes to identifying the height of an object, i.e., how far a vehicle is from an overpass/seeing vertically. 4D radar is also superior to 3D radar in identifying objects in the roadway at long distances and helping the vehicle decide the appropriate action to take. 

Radar can reliably indicate how far away an object is. Typical long-range automotive radars can provide range measurements on objects that are as much as 300 meters to 500 meters away; 4D radar can measure even farther. Cameras, by contrast, must try to estimate how far away an object is based on its size in the camera’s image and other factors.  

4D radar technology provides better interpretation of the scene around a vehicle for the advanced driver assistance system (ADAS) system, enabling for example some Level 2+ (hands off, eyes on) and Level 3 functions (hands off, eyes off) and is crucial to Level 4 and 5 automated vehicles. 4D radar has applications that can be used in everyday situations, in addition to autonomous vehicles.  

What new use case brings the first 4D or imaging radar to market? 

Consumers and OEMs are demanding greater autonomy, which requires better ADAS features. 4D radar can enable ADAS features such as a highway assist of cruise control and piloting. Highway assist of cruise control which potentially would need to trigger a slow-down braking maneuver requires elevation separation capabilities that only 4D imaging radars can offer. 4D’s ability to classify obstacles as capable of being driven over or not is crucial in engaging highway piloting features that might need to trigger an evasive steering maneuver or a slowdown to avoid damaging the vehicle. 

Considering advances in automated driving and autonomy levels, how many 4D or imaging radars do you believe will be required in a vehicle in 2030? 

For vehicles in 2030, the number can vary by use case and OEM but typically one to three radars for a passenger car with a driver while robo-taxis could have more and as many as eight. 

How can interior radar be utilized for occupant detection and health monitoring within vehicles? 

Just to be clear, an interior radar does not have to be 4D. Interior sensing radars can measure respiration rate and reflections, making them highly beneficial for detecting a child or pet left behind even when they might potentially be covered by a blanket or lying in the footwell in the backrow of a vehicle. Interior radars can also assist in intrusion detection. 

Can 4D or imaging radars potentially replace or augment lidar sensors? Or are imaging radar and lidar more likely to coexist in vehicles? 

Lidars and radars will both be required. Lidars have better angular resolution but require more power and compute. Radars are better in inclement weather. Radars and Lidars would be able to help cameras in very dark situations. While lidars are much less sensitive to inclement weather and lighting than cameras, radars are the least affected by inclement weather. Lidars have much better angular discrimination than radar, and higher resolution. The resulting lidar point clouds have much in common with camera images, which enables similar deep learning approaches to cameras, supporting object detection and recognition, including stationary objects. Additionally, lidars can perceive lane markings, which radar cannot. In addition, radar and lidar would provide sensor redundancy to meet the requirements of L3 levels and higher of autonomous driving.  

How does imaging radar compare to traditional radar and to lidar sensors in terms of cost? 

For a lidar with greater than 250 meters distance, the price is $500-$650.This distance would compare to imaging radar. There are lidars closer to $200 but they are range limited to 180 meters max.  

Imaging and 4D radar sensors are the latest innovations in the storied automotive radar sector, and many automakers are introducing them today and in their next-generation platforms in just a few short years. S&P Global Mobility estimates that production of imaging and 4D radar sensors will grow at a compound annual growth rate of nearly 10% through the end of the decade. To learn more, please visit Component Forecast Analytics or contact your account manager.

Contacts

Copyright © 2024 S&P Global Inc. All rights reserved.

These materials, including any software, data, processing technology, index data, ratings, credit-related analysis, research, model, software or other application or output described herein, or any part thereof (collectively the “Property”) constitute the proprietary and confidential information of S&P Global Inc its affiliates (each and together “S&P Global”) and/or its third party provider licensors. S&P Global on behalf of itself and its third-party licensors reserves all rights in and to the Property. These materials have been prepared solely for information purposes based upon information generally available to the public and from sources believed to be reliable.
Any copying, reproduction, reverse-engineering, modification, distribution, transmission or disclosure of the Property, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of S&P Global. The Property shall not be used for any unauthorized or unlawful purposes. S&P Global’s opinions, statements, estimates, projections, quotes and credit-related and other analyses are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security, and there is no obligation on S&P Global to update the foregoing or any other element of the Property. S&P Global may provide index data. Direct investment in an index is not possible. Exposure to an asset class represented by an index is available through investable instruments based on that index. The Property and its composition and content are subject to change without notice.

THE PROPERTY IS PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS. NEITHER S&P GLOBAL NOR ANY THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS (TOGETHER, “S&P GLOBAL PARTIES”) MAKE ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE PROPERTY’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE PROPERTY WILL OPERATE IN ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION, NOR ANY WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO ITS ACCURACY, AVAILABILITY, COMPLETENESS OR TIMELINESS, OR TO THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED FROM THE USE OF THE PROPERTY. S&P GLOBAL PARTIES SHALL NOT IN ANY WAY BE LIABLE TO ANY RECIPIENT FOR ANY INACCURACIES, ERRORS OR OMISSIONS REGARDLESS OF THE CAUSE. Without limiting the foregoing, S&P Global Parties shall have no liability whatsoever to any recipient, whether in contract, in tort (including negligence), under warranty, under statute or otherwise, in respect of any loss or damage suffered by any recipient as a result of or in connection with the Property, or any course of action determined, by it or any third party, whether or not based on or relating to the Property. In no event shall S&P Global be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees or losses (including without limitation lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Property even if advised of the possibility of such damages. The Property should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions.

The S&P Global logo is a registered trademark of S&P Global, and the trademarks of S&P Global used within this document or materials are protected by international laws. Any other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.

The inclusion of a link to an external website by S&P Global should not be understood to be an endorsement of that website or the website's owners (or their products/services). S&P Global is not responsible for either the content or output of external websites. S&P Global keeps certain activities of its divisions separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain divisions of S&P Global may have information that is not available to other S&P Global divisions. S&P Global has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P Global may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P Global reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P Global Ratings’ public ratings and analyses are made available on its sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge) and www.capitaliq.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P Global publications and third party redistributors.