Source: Getty image/metamorworks
Q&A with Digiflec
A digital twin (DT) is a virtual replica of a physical asset that uses real-world data and models to improve operations and aid in decision-making. It incorporates real-time and historical data, as well as engineering, simulation, and machine learning models. By creating a digital twin, the automotive industry can gain insights into the performance and behavior of physical assets, optimize operations and make more informed decisions.
The use of DTs in the automotive industry is expected to become more widespread as the digitization of vehicles continues to advance. DTs have the potential to enhance product design, manufacturing processes and vehicle maintenance, resulting in improved products and a more efficient and reliable automotive industry. As this evolution continues, a key priority will be ensuring functional safety and cybersecurity across various automotive processes. By addressing these requirements, the industry can fully leverage the benefits of DTs while maintaining the highest standards of safety and security.
To delve deeper, S&P Global Mobility initiated discussions with leading players in the DT market, including IBM, Ansys, ABB, rFpro, Digiflec and PTC. All are at the forefront of driving architectural shifts and pushing back the technical boundaries. Representatives of each company share their thoughts on the evolving landscape of DTs.
To gain further insights about Digiflec, we interviewed the director, Steven Gillan. Based in Scotland, Digiflec offers 3D lidar products and software solutions to assist companies in asset management and process automation. They are currently focused on developing a camera and lidar mobile road network survey solution for transportation networks.
The following is an edited transcript of the conversation.
S&P Global Mobility: What are the most promising automotive use cases for DTs?
Steven Gillan: The most promising use cases for DTs include optimising transport networks, enhancing efficiency, and improving scenario understanding. DTs can simulate demand on energy networks and network movements, providing insights into safety and traffic in real-time. They also facilitate vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communications, including with autonomous vehicles. Furthermore, DTs can enhance electric vehicle [EV] parking management and the operation of smart streetlights and signs.
How can smaller companies also take advantage of these opportunities?
Smaller companies can seize these opportunities as DT technology is still emerging and not yet widely adopted. This nascent stage offers a unique chance to introduce innovative solutions tailored to localities and communities. Smaller companies can position themselves at the forefront of innovation, unlocking new possibilities and driving growth.
Could you provide two or three real-world examples of where your company has experience applying DTs? And what were the savings in terms of time and cost?
Here are three examples:
- Forestry and Land Scotland: We developed a mobile mapping system using LiDAR and AI algorithms to map over 10,000 km of rural roads. This innovation replaced the traditional, manual survey methods, resulting in more efficient route planning, resource allocation, and significant cost and time savings.
- Tay Road Bridge/Dundee: By collecting live road user data for a DT for the Tay Road Bridge, we enhanced the operations of the bridge team. This solution provided real-time and historical insights into the bridge’s traffic, replacing disruptive traffic loops that only provided historical data.
- Thornhill/Stirling Council: In partnership with Stirling Council, we deployed the first commercial surround LiDAR traffic monitoring system in the UK. This system was installed in the village of Thornhill to provide detailed data on traffic volumes, vehicle types, speeds, and directions. The insights gained from this data helped to understand the impact of traffic on local air quality and improved traffic management strategies. This project demonstrated the potential of DT technology in enhancing community-centric solutions and contributing to environmental sustainability.
How is the DT scenario priced? Based on scenario complexity? Based on data size? Based on accuracy (number of sensors used to build the synthetic data)?
The pricing of DT scenarios depends on various factors, including the complexity of the scenario, the amount of data involved, and the required accuracy, which is influenced by the number of sensors used to gather data. Ultimately, the pricing is tailored to the specific needs and requirements of each project.
Copyright © 2024 S&P Global Inc. All rights reserved.
These materials, including any software, data, processing technology, index data, ratings, credit-related analysis, research, model, software or other application or output described herein, or any part thereof (collectively the “Property”) constitute the proprietary and confidential information of S&P Global Inc its affiliates (each and together “S&P Global”) and/or its third party provider licensors. S&P Global on behalf of itself and its third-party licensors reserves all rights in and to the Property. These materials have been prepared solely for information purposes based upon information generally available to the public and from sources believed to be reliable.
Any copying, reproduction, reverse-engineering, modification, distribution, transmission or disclosure of the Property, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of S&P Global. The Property shall not be used for any unauthorized or unlawful purposes. S&P Global’s opinions, statements, estimates, projections, quotes and credit-related and other analyses are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security, and there is no obligation on S&P Global to update the foregoing or any other element of the Property. S&P Global may provide index data. Direct investment in an index is not possible. Exposure to an asset class represented by an index is available through investable instruments based on that index. The Property and its composition and content are subject to change without notice.
THE PROPERTY IS PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS. NEITHER S&P GLOBAL NOR ANY THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS (TOGETHER, “S&P GLOBAL PARTIES”) MAKE ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE PROPERTY’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE PROPERTY WILL OPERATE IN ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION, NOR ANY WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO ITS ACCURACY, AVAILABILITY, COMPLETENESS OR TIMELINESS, OR TO THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED FROM THE USE OF THE PROPERTY. S&P GLOBAL PARTIES SHALL NOT IN ANY WAY BE LIABLE TO ANY RECIPIENT FOR ANY INACCURACIES, ERRORS OR OMISSIONS REGARDLESS OF THE CAUSE. Without limiting the foregoing, S&P Global Parties shall have no liability whatsoever to any recipient, whether in contract, in tort (including negligence), under warranty, under statute or otherwise, in respect of any loss or damage suffered by any recipient as a result of or in connection with the Property, or any course of action determined, by it or any third party, whether or not based on or relating to the Property. In no event shall S&P Global be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees or losses (including without limitation lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Property even if advised of the possibility of such damages. The Property should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions.
The S&P Global logo is a registered trademark of S&P Global, and the trademarks of S&P Global used within this document or materials are protected by international laws. Any other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.
The inclusion of a link to an external website by S&P Global should not be understood to be an endorsement of that website or the website's owners (or their products/services). S&P Global is not responsible for either the content or output of external websites. S&P Global keeps certain activities of its divisions separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain divisions of S&P Global may have information that is not available to other S&P Global divisions. S&P Global has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P Global may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P Global reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P Global Ratings’ public ratings and analyses are made available on its sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge) and www.capitaliq.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P Global publications and third party redistributors.