Source: Getty Images
The European Commission plans to apply additional duties of 17.4% on imported BYD cars, 20% on imported Geely EVs and 38.1% on EVs from SAIC
The European Commission has imposed additional duties on the made-in-China electric vehicles imported and sold in Europe, after arriving at a provisional conclusion that the battery-electric vehicles (BEVs) value chain in mainland China benefits from an unfair subsidization, the commission announced June 12.
The announcement comes soon after Valdis Dombrovskis, a Latvian politician who is currently serving the European Commission as executive vice president and a trade commissioner, had recently told the media that the commission could impose new tariffs on Chinese EVs "before the summer break."
Earlier, the commission had alleged that heavily subsidized Chinese EVs are distorting the market in Europe and are a threat of economic injury to European carmakers. It is known that the made-in-China electric cars significantly undercut the price of EVs produced in Europe. As a result, the commission alleges that customers are increasingly opting for competitively priced Chinese EVs over the more expensive models produced in Europe.
To this end, the European Commission had launched an anti-subsidy probe into Chinese EVs in October 2023, with an aim of investigating whether vehicle manufacturers from mainland China are able to artificially keep the costs low, and that these deflated prices would harm European automakers, and subsequently pose a threat to the region’s thriving automotive industry.
On June 12, the European Commission predisclosed the level of provisional countervailing duties it plans to impose on imports of BEVs from mainland China. It said that if discussions with Chinese authorities would fail to reach an effective solution, these provisional countervailing duties would be imposed on the Chinese carmakers from July 4.
The commission said that it plans to apply additional duties of 17.4% on imported BYD cars, 20% on imported Geely EVs and 38.1% on SAIC-made EVs. The commission plans to impose a duty of 38.1% on Chinese EV makers which did not cooperate in the investigation. The other electric-car makers from mainland China which cooperated in the investigation but have not been sampled would be subject to 21% weighted average duty. These duties will be imposed on top of the existing 10% tariff on Chinese EV imports.
“The investigation also examined the likely consequences and impact of measures on importers, users and consumers of BEVs in the EU. Consequently, the Commission has reached out to Chinese authorities to discuss these findings and explore possible ways to resolve the issues identified in a WTO-compatible manner,” the commission said in a statement.
Reportedly, the European Commission had issued letters dated April 23 to the three leading mainland Chinese EV makers — SAIC, BYD and Geely — informing them that they have not provided enough information on the government subsidies they have received, and information about their operations and supply chains.
Taking note that the European Commission has decided to impose provisional countervailing duties on imports of EVs manufactured in mainland China, based on initial findings of the ongoing anti-subsidy probe, the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA) said that free and fair trade is essential in creating a globally competitive European automotive industry, while healthy competition drives innovation and choice for consumers.
“What the European automotive sector needs above all else to be globally competitive is a robust industrial strategy for electromobility,” said ACEA Director General Sigrid de Vries. “This means ensuring access to critical materials and affordable energy, a coherent regulatory framework, sufficient charging and hydrogen refilling infrastructure, market incentives, and so much more.”
ACEA further said that the ongoing investigation will continue for several months until the commission decides whether to propose definitive anti-subsidy measures on the import of EVs produced in mainland China. “Member states will then vote on such a proposal,” it added.
Copyright © 2024 S&P Global Inc. All rights reserved.
These materials, including any software, data, processing technology, index data, ratings, credit-related analysis, research, model, software or other application or output described herein, or any part thereof (collectively the “Property”) constitute the proprietary and confidential information of S&P Global Inc its affiliates (each and together “S&P Global”) and/or its third party provider licensors. S&P Global on behalf of itself and its third-party licensors reserves all rights in and to the Property. These materials have been prepared solely for information purposes based upon information generally available to the public and from sources believed to be reliable.
Any copying, reproduction, reverse-engineering, modification, distribution, transmission or disclosure of the Property, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of S&P Global. The Property shall not be used for any unauthorized or unlawful purposes. S&P Global’s opinions, statements, estimates, projections, quotes and credit-related and other analyses are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security, and there is no obligation on S&P Global to update the foregoing or any other element of the Property. S&P Global may provide index data. Direct investment in an index is not possible. Exposure to an asset class represented by an index is available through investable instruments based on that index. The Property and its composition and content are subject to change without notice.
THE PROPERTY IS PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS. NEITHER S&P GLOBAL NOR ANY THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS (TOGETHER, “S&P GLOBAL PARTIES”) MAKE ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE PROPERTY’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE PROPERTY WILL OPERATE IN ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION, NOR ANY WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO ITS ACCURACY, AVAILABILITY, COMPLETENESS OR TIMELINESS, OR TO THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED FROM THE USE OF THE PROPERTY. S&P GLOBAL PARTIES SHALL NOT IN ANY WAY BE LIABLE TO ANY RECIPIENT FOR ANY INACCURACIES, ERRORS OR OMISSIONS REGARDLESS OF THE CAUSE. Without limiting the foregoing, S&P Global Parties shall have no liability whatsoever to any recipient, whether in contract, in tort (including negligence), under warranty, under statute or otherwise, in respect of any loss or damage suffered by any recipient as a result of or in connection with the Property, or any course of action determined, by it or any third party, whether or not based on or relating to the Property. In no event shall S&P Global be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees or losses (including without limitation lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Property even if advised of the possibility of such damages. The Property should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions.
The S&P Global logo is a registered trademark of S&P Global, and the trademarks of S&P Global used within this document or materials are protected by international laws. Any other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.
The inclusion of a link to an external website by S&P Global should not be understood to be an endorsement of that website or the website's owners (or their products/services). S&P Global is not responsible for either the content or output of external websites. S&P Global keeps certain activities of its divisions separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain divisions of S&P Global may have information that is not available to other S&P Global divisions. S&P Global has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P Global may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P Global reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P Global Ratings’ public ratings and analyses are made available on its sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge) and www.capitaliq.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P Global publications and third party redistributors.