Exports down 2.8% y/y
Overall Japanese vehicle output, comprising passenger cars, trucks and buses, reached 643,901 units during April, according to the figures released by the Japan Automobile Manufacturers' Association (JAMA). This is a 9.7% year-on-year (y/y) decline from 713,240 units sold in April 2015. As the largest category, passenger car output reached 546,397 units, down 7.7% y/y, followed by production of trucks and buses, which reached 88,342 units (down 18.95 y/y) and 9,162 units (down 24.2% y/y), respectively. Within the passenger car category, output of vehicles with an engine displacement in excess of 2.0 litres decreased by 3.9% y/y to 345,528 units, while output of small vehicles declined 2.6% y/y. Similarly, output of minivehicles decreased 28.1% y/y to 130,639 units.
Vehicle exports during the month totalled 369,131 units, sliding 2.8% y/y. Of the total, shipments to North America, the biggest destination for Japanese-made vehicles, decreased 2.6% y/y to reach 147,612 units, followed by Europe, to which exports grew 18.4% y/y to 62,978 units. Shipments to Asia were up 10.9% y/y (43,999 units) during the month, followed by the Middle East with 37,684 units (down 33.3% y/y). Deliveries to Oceania increased 14% y/y to 37,193 units, while they decreased to Latin America, Africa, and Others by 11.7% y/y, 17% y/y, and 55% y/y, respectively.
Japanese automakers' production, April 2016 |
||||
|
Japanese output |
Y/Y % change |
Exports |
Y/Y % change |
Toyota |
200,675 |
-17.3 |
126,724 |
-14.5 |
Mazda |
79,910 |
17.2 |
70,517 |
18.6 |
Suzuki |
68,942 |
-18.5 |
9,412 |
-12.9 |
Nissan |
60,086 |
-5.1 |
37,726 |
-17.1 |
Fuji Heavy |
59,562 |
11.6 |
55,699 |
14.8 |
Honda |
51,581 |
-0.7 |
10,649 |
674% |
Daihatsu |
46,739 |
-11.7 |
- |
- |
Mitsubishi |
38,713 |
-16.7 |
33,986 |
-4.0 |
Source: Automakers' websites. |
Market leader Toyota's domestic production reached 200,675 units during the month, a decrease of 17.3% y/y. The decline can be mainly attributed to the production halt announced by the automaker after two earthquakes struck the Kyushu Island, forcing the automaker to suspend 26 domestic assembly lines due to parts shortages. Toyota Group was among the worst affected by the event as its key supplier Aisin Seiki suspended production at two of its plants. As of 6 May, Toyota had resumed assembly operations at all of its domestic production line. Mazda took the second spot and produced 79,910 units, up 17.2% y/y, thanks to greater output of passenger cars. Mazda was followed by Suzuki and Nissan, which produced 68,942 and 60,086 units, respectively. In the fifth spot, Fuji Heavy's output reached 59,562 units, up 11.6% y/y. During the month, Mitsubishi suspended production and sales of four minivehicle models (the eK Wagon and eK Space, and the Nissan-badged versions of those models, the Dayz and Dayz Roox) after it admitted to using non-compliant fuel-efficiency tests. Its production volume declined 16.7% y/y during the month to reach 38,713 units. The scandal-hit automaker is expected to continue suspended minivehicle production at its Mizushima plant until the end of June.
Outlook and implications
After witnessing positive growth results in March following three consecutive months of decline, Japanese output fell again during April. The country's output has been suffering because of stagnant domestic demand, particularly for minivehicles since 2015. Furthermore, during April, production disruptions caused by twin earthquakes and Mitsubishi's fuel economy scandal further dented consumer demand resulting in lower output volumes in the country .
According to IHS Automotive production data, Japanese vehicle output will grow in 2016 to reach around 9.3 million vehicles, up 2.2% y/y. The delay in another increase in consumption tax to 10% from the current 8% until April 2017 (originally scheduled for October 2015) is forecasted to support the Japanese market between the fourth quarter of 2016 and the first quarter of 2017. By segment, production of passenger cars will rise 2.6% y/y to over 7.9 million vehicles in 2016, output of medium to heavy commercial vehicles (MHCVs) will be up 1.7% y/y to 341,772 units, whereas production of light commercial vehicles (LCVs) will decline by 1.1% y/y to 995,367 units. Following the Kyushu earthquakes, IHS issued forecasts of the time required for the lost production volume to be recovered. According to IHS Automotive forecasting, the aftermath of the Kyushu earthquake is dragging on and the time needed to recover lost production is extending as suppliers and OEMs struggle to find extra working days to make up for the lost time. According to our latest May forecast scenario, lost volumes will expand to 100,000 units in June without any recovery, and production will only start recovering from July.
Copyright © 2024 S&P Global Inc. All rights reserved.
These materials, including any software, data, processing technology, index data, ratings, credit-related analysis, research, model, software or other application or output described herein, or any part thereof (collectively the “Property”) constitute the proprietary and confidential information of S&P Global Inc its affiliates (each and together “S&P Global”) and/or its third party provider licensors. S&P Global on behalf of itself and its third-party licensors reserves all rights in and to the Property. These materials have been prepared solely for information purposes based upon information generally available to the public and from sources believed to be reliable.
Any copying, reproduction, reverse-engineering, modification, distribution, transmission or disclosure of the Property, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of S&P Global. The Property shall not be used for any unauthorized or unlawful purposes. S&P Global’s opinions, statements, estimates, projections, quotes and credit-related and other analyses are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security, and there is no obligation on S&P Global to update the foregoing or any other element of the Property. S&P Global may provide index data. Direct investment in an index is not possible. Exposure to an asset class represented by an index is available through investable instruments based on that index. The Property and its composition and content are subject to change without notice.
THE PROPERTY IS PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS. NEITHER S&P GLOBAL NOR ANY THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS (TOGETHER, “S&P GLOBAL PARTIES”) MAKE ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE PROPERTY’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE PROPERTY WILL OPERATE IN ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION, NOR ANY WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO ITS ACCURACY, AVAILABILITY, COMPLETENESS OR TIMELINESS, OR TO THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED FROM THE USE OF THE PROPERTY. S&P GLOBAL PARTIES SHALL NOT IN ANY WAY BE LIABLE TO ANY RECIPIENT FOR ANY INACCURACIES, ERRORS OR OMISSIONS REGARDLESS OF THE CAUSE. Without limiting the foregoing, S&P Global Parties shall have no liability whatsoever to any recipient, whether in contract, in tort (including negligence), under warranty, under statute or otherwise, in respect of any loss or damage suffered by any recipient as a result of or in connection with the Property, or any course of action determined, by it or any third party, whether or not based on or relating to the Property. In no event shall S&P Global be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees or losses (including without limitation lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Property even if advised of the possibility of such damages. The Property should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions.
The S&P Global logo is a registered trademark of S&P Global, and the trademarks of S&P Global used within this document or materials are protected by international laws. Any other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.
The inclusion of a link to an external website by S&P Global should not be understood to be an endorsement of that website or the website's owners (or their products/services). S&P Global is not responsible for either the content or output of external websites. S&P Global keeps certain activities of its divisions separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain divisions of S&P Global may have information that is not available to other S&P Global divisions. S&P Global has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P Global may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P Global reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P Global Ratings’ public ratings and analyses are made available on its sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge) and www.capitaliq.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P Global publications and third party redistributors.